Collection
Miguel de Múzquiz y Goyeneche, I conde de Gausa y I marqués de Villar de Ladrón [Miguel de Múzquiz y Goyeneche, I Count of Gausa and I Marquis of Villar de Ladrón]
- c. 1783
- Oil on canvas
- 200 x 114 cm
- Cat. P_542
- Acquired in 1993
- Observations: Goya realizó otro retrato de tres cuartos de Miguel de Múzquiz entre 1783 y 1785 que perteneció a José Lázaro Galdiano hasta poco después de 1913. Procedencia: Colección Casa Torres
On 22 January 1785, Goya sent a letter to his friend, Martín Zapater, informing him of the death the day before of Miguel de Múzquiz, Count of Gausa (Elbete, Navarre, 1719 – Madrid, 1785), who had been Charles III’s finance minister since the fall of Esquilache in 1766. In his contemporary biography of Charles III, the Count of Fernán Núñez praised his economic achievements: “If Spain had had the fortune to enjoy a longer period with the minister Múzquiz, who worked alongside the Count of Floridablanca for the common good, this Company [of the Philippines] and Banco de San Carlos would have prospered infinitely, reinforcing the spirit of circulation and trade throughout the kingdom...” (vol. II, p. 23). A very straightforward and kind-hearted individual from a Navarrese family of minor nobility and traders, passionate about classical literature and a reader of Tacitus who knew the poetry of Virgil and Ovid by heart, Múzquiz was not, however, held in such high esteem by foreign ambassadors to the court. In 1767, the Austrian ambassador said that he ran the ministry in an old-fashioned way, with no capacity for reform. The ambassador’s successor, Prince Lobkowitz, was of much the same opinion, observing that Múzquiz “does not seem to possess exceptional intelligence or wisdom.” The French ambassador Jean-François Bourgoing, the author of the memorable Tableau de l’Espagne Moderne published in 1797, considered him “timid and distrustful, and an enemy of change,” and the Count of Cabarrús went so far as to emphasise his mistrusting nature in his Funeral Elegy, read in 1786. The print by the engraver Fernando Selma that appeared as that elegy’s frontispiece when it was published in 1787, two years after the count’s death in 1785, suggests that Banco de España’s portrait was a later posthumous work, as the print is inscribed “Goya dibujó” (drawn by Goya) rather than “Goya pinxit” (painted by Goya), and there is, in fact, a preparatory drawing by Goya for that portrait. Nonetheless, while posthumous portraits of other eminent figures were sometimes commissioned, this was not a frequent event; it was much more common to have one’s portrait painted after receiving honours from the king. Múzquiz was named Count of Gausa by the monarch in 1783, and he received the Grand Cross of the Order of Charles III at the same time. In this portrait, he wears its sash and cross, along with the insignia of a knight of the Order of Santiago, a distinction he had obtained in 1743.
These royal honours, and the fact that this is an early portrait by Goya in terms of style and technique, indicate that it was painted in 1783. Moreover, there are two contemporary copies in which the count is shown half-length or three-quarter-length, one of them depicting him with a light blue frock coat. This indicates that the original was an official portrait for an important location, possibly the Finance Ministry, with replicas for other institutions or for his family (the copy from the Lázaro collection, a three-quarter-length view, may have been the one listed in his daughter’s will of 1808 with a value of 1,000 reales, excessively low for a work by Goya). In this work, the paper held by Múzquiz reads: “To the Most Excellent Lord Count/ of Gausa kn/ight grand cross of the.../ Most excellent Lord…”, and the original portrait at the bank still bears traces of that same inscription. In the meantime, Goya’s drawing differs from the painting. It is a half-length presentation with some significant variants, including the way the document held by Múzquiz is folded. A new fold makes it longer, so that it occupies a decisive angle in the foreground of the composition. Another essential difference with regard to the painting indicates the drawing was made after it, rather than before: the clearly broadened profile of the count’s shoulder to the right makes his position more frontal in keeping with a formula found more often in prints, while the canvas presents his entire body turned slightly to the right, and thus almost in half-profile.
Múzquiz knew Goya before 1783, as he had signed invoices for cartoons that the artist delivered to the Royal Tapestry Factory between 1775 and 1789. He may therefore have chosen Goya himself to paint his portrait, although he might also have followed the advice of Floridablanca. The painting’s colours—the deep greens and golds on the table and armchair, the warm shades of the tiled floor, and the deep purples of the clothing over a dark reddish priming—are very close to those in Goya’s earliest known portrait, Antonio Veián y Monteagudo (Museum of Fine Arts, Huesca, 1782). There, too, the figure is alone in the space, with a slightly turned body that adds a sense of movement. But it is less natural than the more sophisticated and complex portrait of Floridablanca, where Goya resolves the central figure and those of his colleagues with greater elegance and naturalism. His strong, precise brushstrokes reveal the count’s solid and tranquil personality, as well as a sense of melancholy reflected in the subtle tilt of his head. Every detail of his face is precisely defined with modulated tonalities that speak of a painting from life, as in other portraits he is known to have painted before a model rather than from a drawing or from memory. The trust that Gausa inspired among his friends, collaborators and subordinates is also conveyed by Goya’s placement of his feet firmly on the ground, linked by the white brushstrokes that perfectly define their form and weight. The detailed, paint-laden execution of the embroidery on his frock coat and waistcoat and the silver buckles on his shoes firmly locate his figure in the brightly lit space, while some areas, such as the gleams of his silk frock coat, reveal the masterfully rapid touch that would later characterise the artist’s most advanced painting.
Born in Elvetea, a locality in the Baztán Valley, in 1719. Since his family was not rich and he was not entitled to inherit under the local laws, he went to seek his fortune at court. There was a coterie of Navarrese courtiers and financiers in Madrid, among them his first cousin José Ignacio Goyeneche, who helped the welleducated young man to obtain his first job at the finance secretariat in 1738. In 1739 he joined the Congregation of Saint Fermin of the Navarrese, a pious institution that agglutinated the Navarrese living in Madrid. His personal qualities combined with growing experience to enable him to rise in the administration. He also ascended in social rank when he was admitted in 1749 to the Order of Calatrava under the auspices of Juan Francisco de Goyeneche, Marquis of Ugena, the business partner of the merchant Ignacio Clemente y Ugarte. In 1749, he married the latter’s daughter, Javiera Ignacia Clemente Leoz.
As he rose in the finance secretariat, he gradually distanced himself from the Navarrese circle and the court intrigues centred on Isabella Farnese. He had excellent masters and patrons, especially the Marquis of La Ensenada, and so took part in the reforms and economic recovery initiated by Philip V after the Peace of Aix-la-Chapelle. By the time of the death of Ferdinand VI, he was a prestigious figure in the finance secretariat. In 1760 he was appointed as assistant to the Marquis of La Ensenada in the supreme finance secretariat, and in 1763 he became the assistant of the Marquis of Esquilache, who was implementing Campomanes’s reform programme. In 1765, he went to Parma and returned to Madrid with Maria Luisa of Parma, married by proxy to the Prince of Asturias, and he also accompanied the Infanta María Luisa to the court of Vienna for her marriage to the future Archduke Leopold II. It was for this service that the empress of Austria, Maria Theresa of Habsburg, awarded him the title of Marquis of Villar de Ladrón.
In 1766, after the Esquilache riots, a new team was needed to satisfy the demands that had sparked off the revolts while continuing the reforms already undertaken. Charles III surrounded himself with unconditional supporters. Esquilache was replaced by Múzquiz in the finance secretariat, and by Muniaín in that of war. The Count of Aranda replaced Floridablanca in the chair of the Council of Castile, and Floridablanca became his fiscal advocate. The new team upheld continuity, resulting in what were called the realizaciones (accomplishments) of Charles III.
As finance secretary, Múzquiz introduced the lottery to increase state revenue, and stimulated agriculture, trade (franchises and exemptions) and industry. He supported Pablo de Olavide in the settlement of Sierra Morena, a plan he had devised with Campomanes. The settlement of these lands was one of the largest projects in the agrarian policy of the eighteenth century. La Carolina named him its honorary mayor in 1767, and has maintained the custom to this day with every finance minister. He supported the creation of the economic societies, and took part personally in the financing of projects for economic development, like the promotion of mulberry production on the lands he owned in Sueca (Valencia), where what are known as the ‘Múzquiz’ irrigation canal and mill are still to be seen. Also worthy of mention, owing to its significance, was the part he played in the expulsion of the Jesuits by the Pragmatic Sanction of 29 January 1767, and his involvement in the purchase of new premises for the San Fernando Academy of Fine Arts.
On 4 July 1776, the United States of America declared independence from Britain. France very quickly supported the revolutionaries, whereas Spain was more hesitant owing to the possible consequences for its own colonies. Finally, Spain went to war with England in 1779, but without forming an alliance with the American rebels or recognising the new state, despite some collaboration with them. In 1778, the reforms continued with the publication of the Decree of Freedom of Trade with America, which greatly boosted the development of Cádiz and Barcelona. Barcelona tripled its volume of trade and saw the arrival of the new textile industry.
In 1779, he argued in favour of the creation of the future Banco Nacional de San Carlos. He, Floridablanca and Gálvez drew up the Provisional ruling of His Majesty for the founding and direction of a national bank of Spain and America, citing financial support for the state as the principal justification for such a step, together with the possibility of satisfying the demand for liquidity by creating paper currency to compensate for interruptions in the arrival of American bullion amidst naval confrontations with England.
In 1780, he was appointed war secretary and State Councillor. The attempt to recover Gibraltar failed, and the growing needs of the Army and Navy led the government to issue a new type of debt, the vales reales (royal debentures), to back the loan of nine million pesos de vellón advanced by a consortium of bankers. The need to regulate and redeem them, combined with the intrinsic attractions of the project, led to the creation of Banco Nacional de San Carlos by a Royal Decree of 15 May 1782. Once more, Múzquiz showed a personal interest by buying shares. The war ended in 1783 with the Peace of Versailles. Spain recovered Minorca, but definitively lost Gibraltar and Florida.
Exhausted and aging, Múzquiz relinquished his posts as finance and war secretary at the age of 64. His services were acknowledged with the Grand Cross of Charles III (1781) and the concession of the title of Count of Gausa in 1783. The deaths of friends and relatives that year undermined his health. He died at the royal palace of El Pardo on 21 January 1785. His friend and protégé Cabarrús read the Eulogy to His Excellency the Count of Gausa at the General Assembly of Madrid’s Royal Society of Friends of the Country. In it, he praised the count’s solid expertise, prudence, honourability, neutrality, efficiency, industry and popularity. In 1825, Canga Argüelles rated him as one of the most important finance ministers alongside Ensenada, Colbert, Necker and Pitt.
Other works by Francisco de Goya y Lucientes